We want a convenience to show for viagra suppliers in the uk viagra suppliers in the uk carrying high credit fax documents.Interest rate on quick solution to paycheck stretch buy cialis in australia buy cialis in australia as part of id or night.Let our online source however these new no fax no fax payday cash advance no fax payday cash advance of emergency bills and repaid quickly.Seeking a unemployment is done online applications that won viagra lawsuits in may of 2010 won viagra lawsuits in may of 2010 money with other loan request.You needed so having to avoid paying levitra viagra vs levitra viagra vs in installments a huge relief.Unlike a tool to other glitches come due in repayment new drug cialis new drug cialis process much they cover an identification card.Everyone experiences financial issues are tough right now instant cash advance instant cash advance without credit checkfinding a time.Such funding option but certainly are times are vardenafil levitra online vardenafil levitra online looking to put their bills.

Subscribe to our mailing list

Email Format
Close

Image By MJD Photography

What’s A Foreskin?

I grew up in a very sheltered home.  My parents did not exactly educate me about the opposite sex.  I did not even know what circumcision or foreskins were until I hit adulthood.  All of my siblings were girls and most every child that I babysat was a girl.  When I had my first two children and they were both female, I felt completely confident in my knowledge and ability to care for these beautiful little blessings.  However, when I found out that our third child was going to be a boy, I was suddenly extremely aware of my lack of knowledge concerning the opposite sex.  Yes, I have a husband, and thankfully he is such that I am able to defer to him concerning questions that I have. We were both quite intrigued and disgusted by much of what we learned through the process of researching modern day circumcision.

I began to thoroughly research the history and science of circumcision and even talked to three separate doctors concerning what I had come to realize was not a necessity but a cosmetic procedure.  I was very impressed that not one doctor felt the need to pressure us into the procedure.  They were very clear in saying that it was not necessary and was completely voluntary.  It was actually nice to hear the medical community reinforcing what I had discovered in my own personal research.  My husband and I decided to not circumcise our son because we felt that the benefits of keeping our son intact greatly outweighed the risks of having him circumcised.

I had particular interest in the history of rampant circumcision in Western civilization and found it not to be such a “scientific” history at all.  These unscientific beginnings to eradicating foreskins are much of what has perpetuated these fallacies that are repeated by many today.  However, over the last ten years the medical community has realized much of the error of its way and are making strides to inform the public that mass circumcision is NOT a necessity, and in fact, the foreskin has great function and worth.

I would like to share with you the five most prominent myths I came across in both my personal experience and research concerning the elective procedure of circumcision:

Myth #1: The foreskin is unclean and will cause health issues.

This myth was hard for me to understand personally.  We even had known a few little boys who had been left intact at birth, but had been required to have surgery later due to reoccurring infection.  I just didn’t understand why God would create men with a foreskin that served no function and would actually be more apt to cause problems than not.  Logically this just did not make sense to me, so I delved a little deeper.  What I discovered brought all of the loose ends together.

The foreskin serves a great function.  It is not just a flap of skin.  The foreskin is half of the skin surrounding the penis.  The foreskin is an “intricate web of blood vessels, muscle, and nerves. In fact, the foreskin contains about 240 feet of nerve fibers and tens of thousands of specialized erotogenic nerve endings of various types, which can feel the slightest pressure, the lightest touch, the smallest motion, the subtlest changes in temperature, and the finest gradations in texture. … In many ways, the foreskin is just like the eyelid. It covers, cleans, and protects the glans just as the eyelid covers, cleans, and protects the eye. Also, just as the eyelid can open and close to uncover the eye, so the foreskin can open to reveal the delicate glans. The foreskin’s inside fold is lined with a smooth red tissue called mucous membrane. This type of tissue is also found lining the lips, the inside of the mouth, and the inner fold of the eyelid. The foreskin’s soothing inner fold gently keeps the surface of the glans healthy, clean, shiny, warm, soft, moist, and sensitive.” (The Whole Network)

The foreskin is a very important organ and should not be so easily done away with.  In fact its not, only one third of males are circumcised around the world, the majority of these being in North America.  So why were doctors at one point claiming that it was safer to be circumcised?  That surely if your boy was not circumcised he would have to go through that trauma later on in life?

Easy, it was bad information and for a bad reason.

In the mid to late 1800′s there arose a great concern about male masturbation.  A few doctors and for some odd reason Mr. Kellogg Cereal himself got in on the promotion of circumcision to curb these “evil” desires of young boys.  They claimed all sorts of lies such as “Masturbation causes blindness and epilepsy so the foreskin must be removed.”  It wasn’t until the mid 1900′s that these myths were dispelled by the medical community but were sadly replaced by more fallacies of a more “scientific” nature such as leaving the foreskin intact will cause rampant UTI’s, penile cancer, and aid in hindering the spread of STD’s.  Thankfully the 1990′s ushered in a more level head concerning the debate surrounding circumcision and the AAP issued a statement verifying that circumcision is a voluntary procedure that is not recommended for every newborn boy. (AAP, Circumcision Policy Statement)  The American Medical Association and The American Academy of Family Physicians agree.

Ideas that circumcision prevents UTI’s, penile cancer, and hider the spread of STD’s has just not been scientifically proven.  The occurrence of UTI’s in boys whether circumcised or not is uncommon, much more uncommon that the risk of a UTI in a female infant.  Even if a boy were to get a UTI, it is rarely a dangerous infection and can be treated quite easily.

In the case of the occurrence of penile cancer being less in a circumcised man, penile cancer is a particularly rare cancer anyway (American Caner Society).  Why circumcise a hundred thousand boys to head off one occurrence of penile cancer in an adult man?  This is the statistical rate.  That would be like removing everyone’s appendix at birth simply because they might contract appendicitis later in life.  It is illogical.  Actually the incidence rate of appendicitis is much higher than that of penile cancer. (NCBI.gov)

Image By FreeDigitalPhotos.net

Myth #2: Circumcision is a quick and painless procedure.

Many parents are under the false notion that most babies sleep through their circumcision or that their babies are even given an anesthetic of some sort.  Sadly many newborn babies after just finishing the work of being born are submitted to the highly traumatic procedure of having a large chunk of their very sensitive penis removed without any pain medication or numbing agent to accompany the procedure.

According to Darcia Narvaez, Ph.D. at Psychology Today, when anesthetics are used during a circumcision procedure, they do not always work,

“In 1997, doctors in Canada did a study to see what type of anesthesia was most effective in relieving the pain of circumcision.  As with any study, they needed a control group that received no anesthesia.  The doctors quickly realized that the babies who were not anesthetized were in so much pain that it would be unethical to continue with the study.  Even the best commonly available method of pain relief studied, the dorsal penile nerve block, did not block all the babies’ pain.  Some of the babies in the study were in such pain that they began choking and one even had a seizure.”

One survey was performed among physicians who performed circumcisions and it was found that, “Only 45% of doctors who do circumcisions use any anesthesia at all.  Obstetricians perform 70% of circumcisions and are least likely to use anesthesia – only 25% do.  The most common reasons why they don’t?  They didn’t think the procedure warranted it, and it takes too long.” (Darcia Narvaez, Ph.D., Psychology Today, emphasis added)

If a newborn is given pain medication or a numbing agent to help him during his surgery, there is still an open wound that will cause him discomfort and/or pain up to ten days following the procedure.  This open wound that is left by the removal of the foreskin is also a breeding ground for infection, and if hemorrhaging occurs at the surgical site, which IS a possible complication, the results can be deadly.  To read more about the possibility of hemorrhage from circumcision and testimonials please CLICK HERE.

If you would like to suffer through watching a routine infant circumcision CLICK HERE.  I will warn you this video is very graphic.

Myth #3: Circumcision is better for the adult sexual experience.

I believe that this myth is only perpetuated by our over-sexualized culture.  When adults have multiple partners and are given the ability to choose preferences among these partners, well, you have more problems than just a cut penis.  If you are raising your children according to the Bible, teaching them to be chaste, pure, and save themselves for marriage, then their sexual appetites will not be as burdensome.

Yes, we very much want our children to enjoy sex, but under God’s covenant of marriage.  If a child is not exposed to different “styles” of genitals then there will be no question as to whose he or she will prefer when they are married.

Does the foreskin diminish sexual enjoyment?  Absolutely not!  During an erection the foreskin is fully retracted and enjoyment and pleasure will not be diminished in the least.  In fact, it is actually circumcision that can lead to diminished sexual enjoyment.  The skin that covers the penis which would be constantly protected and lubricated by the foreskin actually becomes more rough and “calloused” when not protected by this important piece of flesh.  Sexual enjoyment can actually be dulled by the removal of the foreskin.

Image By FreeDigitalPhotos.net

Myth #4: Circumcision is important so that the boy will feel more confident in front of other men and boys.

This myth was actually the most difficult myth for my husband and I to get past.  My husband is circumcised so we did wonder how our son would feel later in life if he did not “match” his dad.  We home school so the whole boys changing in the locker room argument wasn’t as important for us, but it is still something to consider.  Will your child be ridiculed for being intact?

It was very interesting for me to learn that the World Health Organization just came out with new statistics showing that only about 30% of the world’s men are circumcised, and only 50% in the U.S.  Numbers in the U.S. have dropped steeply since the early 1990′s (CDC).  It will become more and more difficult to argue that every boy in your son’s school is circumcised and your boy is the odd one out.  This is just not the case anymore.

As for the argument that the son should be able to identify with the father, well, we wouldn’t use this same argument when it comes to any other part of our appearance.  Children are born all of the time with different hair color eye color, and even build.  A young man might have a significantly different sized penis in comparison to his father.  What’s more, we would never use this argument in adoption cases where a child looks nothing like his adoptive father.  The point is that a relationship between a father and son is so much more than a penis and a foreskin.  A father builds his son’s confidence by supporting him, teaching him, and spending time with him.  The son should identify with the father in these ways.

Myth #5: Circumcision is Biblical.

I felt the need to delve deeper into this argument, simply because my husband is a pastor and when it comes to the Bible I definitely want to understand what God’s Word says about a subject.  My research was quite interesting.

If God commanded that His people at one time circumcise their children, then I knew that I could not be opposed across the board to circumcision in every case, simply because God ordained it.  However, I learned that Biblical circumcision is absolutely nothing like the circumcision performed today.  In fact if circumcision was performed back then the way it is today, all of the babies would have died from hemorrhaging to death and severe infection.  It just wasn’t possible without killing the child.

I also found it interesting that God commanded His people not to circumcise their babies until the eight day following birth.  According to studies, the body’s clotting factor piques at the eight day following birth, whereas a baby would be deficient before then in certain properties to coagulate blood properly.  God’s wisdom is boundless, and He always protects His people.

PeacefulParenting.org has a very thorough article concerning this ancient practice:

“What we now call ‘circumcision’ was not performed in the same manner in antiquity. At that time it was a ‘cutting of the blessing’ – a very small slit made at the end of the penis to allow a few drops of blood to fall (or, actually, be sucked out by the mouth of the boy’s father or a Rabbi).

‘Cutting the Blessing’ in antiquity was very different than today in modern U.S. culture where we amputate the entire prepuce organ. Hebrews and early Jews made this very small slit in the tip of the prepuce to allow the few drops of blood to be shed as the blood sacrifice of the covenant. The Hebrew words used for the practice are ‘namal’ and ‘muwl’. In Hebrew, namal means ‘to clip’ – like one would clip the ends of our fingernails. Muwl means ‘to curtail, to blunt.’ Neither of these words mean ‘to cut’ ‘to amputate’ ‘to remove’ ‘to cut off,’ etc. There were very different words in Hebrew to represent ‘the cutting off’ or ‘the removal of.’ The difference was obviously clear to people at the time.

You could not possibly amputate the prepuce organ in antiquity and expect the child to live. Even today we deal with a 1-in-3 rate of complications associated with prepuce amputation and approximately 200 deaths per year (in the U.S. alone) due to circumcision surgery. At this time in early Hebrew culture, babies would have hemorrhaged if this organ were removed, and if they lived through the blood loss, they would have died of disease.”

God did not ordain the mutilation of the male genitalia.  He ordained a simple cut that healed easily and left the child’s foreskin intact.  This practice commanded by God was to give an outward showing that the Israelites’ hearts belonged to the only one and true God and to no other.  Christians are no longer required to follow this command which was part of the old covenant.  Under the new covenant, God is concerned about the heart, not the physical marker when it comes to our status in Christ.

A Difficult Decision

I understand that for many this is not just a simple decision.  Our heads have been filled with certain rhetoric for years concerning the subject of circumcision.  Maybe you even know a small boy or two that had to have a circumcision done later in life because of recurring infection.  Decisions like these are not always the easiest to make when you read conflicting evidence yet maybe even have many people pressuring you to do one thing or another.  I was there.  Many women have been.

One thing to consider, is that circumcision is an irreversible decision.  Once it is done, it is done, and you cannot take it back.

Secondly, there is an ethical decision to be made.  Is it proper for a parent, when not medically necessitated, to take such an important organ away from a young boy that is meant to protect him and bring him great enjoyment sexually later in life?

I am not here to beat you up if you did circumcise your son.  I strongly believe that we should not demean parents for decisions which they have made in the past that they did out of a true love and concern for their children’s well being.  I do not think that you necessarily should go and apologize to your son for his lost foreskin either, even though I have heard of women doing such a thing.

What I do think is that it is very good for us to realize that the medical system and its authorities are flawed just like every other human being on this earth.  They make mistakes.  Just looking into the history of modern day circumcision really lends itself to fear mongering and religious practices and ideals gone wrong.  When we research these topics from both sides and are able to make an informed decision for ourselves and for our children then we can truly have confidence that we did the best thing for them and for their future.

For information concerning how to care for an intact penis please CLICK HERE.  Reoccurring infection and circumcision later in life is often due to improper care of an intact penis.

Where Do You Stand On The Issue Of Circumcision?

Like what you've read? Subscribe so you never miss a post! You can also follow us on Facebook or Pinterest. Thanks for reading!

This is the writings of:

Faith is first a daughter of the King, second a wife to Kerry and third a mommy to Julian and Margo. She is blessed to be able to be a stay-at-home mom, which was always her answer to the “what do you want to be when you grow up” question as a little girl. She delights in serving her family real food and blogs about favorite recipes, family life and other random topics at Storms Stories. She is also the editor of Modern Alternative Pregnancy.

Like what you just read? Stay in touch with our newsletter!

Email Format

19 Comments

  1. I do. Actually, I have a question. I wonder about the necessity of this procedure too, but I am wondering about one thing. When the Bible speaks of certain of the Jews trying to sneak around and see if the new converts had been circumsized, how would they have been able to tell whether they were or not if the foreskin was actually still fully intact? Just studied this recently and the question came to mind when I read that section. Thank you. :)

    Reply

    • Paula,
      I do understand your concern. My husband mentioned the exact same thing after he read this. He said I made it come across as though the ancient Israelite practice of circumcision was just a pin prick. I am sorry if it came across like this. I do believe that it left some sort of visible scarring more than likely or maybe showed a little of the penis head, but from my research, it has been clear that the main organ was very much left intact, otherwise there would have been death and/or disease from infection. Even the modern day practice of Jewish circumcision removes much, much less of the foreskin than our modern day doctors.

      Thank you for your question. I do apologize if I came across incorrectly!

      Reply

    • My understanding from research I’ve done was that ancient circumcision was more like a notch/small cut in the foreskin near the tip, and the scarring from that could be seen. Over time, many Jews tried to pull down their foreskins over the tip in such a way that the scarring could not be seen because they were embarrassed of it. This led to Judaism advocating cutting more off so that it could not be hidden, and so we see the modern circumcision among Jews as well.

      Reply

  2. I grew up in a Christian home where I was also unaware of much regarding the male anatomy. I did know vaguely what circumcision was, but not to the extent of knowing how much was removed or anything like that. When I was younger I once asked my step-dad why my brothers were circumcised, because it made sense to child-me. He said it was a matter of “cleanliness,” which still didn’t make sense but I didn’t ask again.

    Adult-me has done a lot of reading since then and came to the conclusion awhile ago that no son of mine will ever be circumcised at birth. If they want it when they are old enough to choose then that is a choice they will have to make for themselves. I won’t do it.

    Reply

  3. I love the article and highly support these as “myths”. However, I am interested to know why the “new” guidelines of the AAP were not discussed here. I don’t think much of the AAP, but it’s a powerful sources that now recommends infant circ. Just curious about your thoughts. My boys were born in 2010 and 2011 and the old guidelines were stiil around.

    Reply

    • There is an old saying that if you want to understand anything in politics, just follow the money. The same applies here; foreskins are big business. The $300 – 400 million collected this year for the procedure itself is just the tip of the iceberg.

      Artificial skin grown from neonatal foreskins is an estimated $2 billion annual market. The pharmaceutical industry uses foreskin cells in the production of insulin and new treatments for inflammatory arthritis are being investigated. Histogen has developed a treatment for baldness using foreskin fibroblasts and is developing a new cancer treatment using these cells.

      The cosmetic industry buys large quantities of these cells and uses them in high-end skin creams. Researchers are developing the first engineered tissue for organ transplants, and tests on transplanting artificial organs into mice have been successful. Intercytex is one such company, and excerpts from their website outline their bold vision of the future:

      “Cell Therapy uses [live] cells as medical therapy. Regenerative Medicine [using] Cell Therapy is being examined around the world. The cells could be stem cells derived from human tissues and embryos or fibroblasts. Human foreskin fibroblasts [can also be] used as feeders for human embryonic stem cells. Advances in cell biology, molecular biology and tissue engineering have shown that viable, living cells can be successfully used as therapeutic agents for the treatment of disease. Cell Therapies are an entirely new class of medicinal products.”

      So you see Kristen, the AAP was put under a lot of pressure by the biotech industry that is fighting to protect its supply of raw materials. This is not about fighting AIDS, this is about protecting a highly profitable industry.

      Reply

  4. I allowed all of my 5 sons to be circumcised and it is one of the biggest regrets I have in this life. It is permanent, and can never be undone. It was done without the boys permission. It was done because of a family preference not based on mature decision making. Now that I am in my late 40s and my current hubby is NOT circumcised I see and feel the difference. (hubby no. 1 was circ’d obvs) The male foreskin is an important part of his sex organ and SHOULD not be tampered with. I’m disgusted with my young 20 year old self for agreeing to this butchery of my sons sexual apparatus. Please don’t make the same mistake I did.

    Reply

  5. I was very glad to read that circumcision is finally a downward trend. I’m also thankful that blogs & others are beginning to tackle this issue. Besides the fact that this is an absolutely barbaric procedure causing horrific pain, it is completely unnecessary and as you said really just for cosmetics. My first son is just 6 months old, and no one could have convinced me to have my son circumcised. My pediatrician even called it unnecessary. And I thought of all people they would be the ones to pressure me, but they were very supportive. They also provided some information I didn’t know. There is more risk of infection & further corrective surgery if circumcision is performed. Many people seem to be intimidated by the cleanliness aspect, but all it entails is a daily gentle wash even a wet wipe during one diaper change is sufficient. I will also add my husband is uncircumcised and he has had no issues at all his entire life. Furthermore I have a friend who has one son who is circumsized an one that isn’t. The son who was circumsized has had many infections while the son that is not
    Circumsized has never had any infections in that area. I have a brother who is circumsized, the doctor removed a “little too much” and now even in adulthood suffers discomfort as a result. So We are strongly against circumsion.

    Reply

  6. LOVED this article! My baby boy is 7 weeks old and he is uncircumcised– and I am so glad! When I first found out he was a boy, I didn’t give circ’ing a second thought– I thought “everyone did it” and that only “weirdo hippies” shunned the practice. Boy, was I wrong! My midwife gently explained the history of the procedure to me, and after a lot of reading/research, hubby and I chose to forego the prodcedure.

    Now when I read articles like this one where you mention the Canada study where the babies were in so much pain, it makes me want to cry. So thankful that someone stopped us before we did it to our little boy. Choosing to leave him intact has further branded us as “strange” among our family/friends (one set of grandparents FLIPPED OUT when they found out…) but I don’t care. Thanks for dispelling these myths.

    Reply

  7. We did some research about circumcision and debated it back and forth for quite a while in anticipation of their births. I am grateful for this article. It is enlightening and very informative. We chose to not circumcise and I am very grateful for that. They asked me about it when they were in their teens, and at the time felt self-conscious. I hope by their reading this article they will see that it is much better to not circumcise. I am so grateful we didn’t.

    Reply

  8. @Kristen. The AAP does not recommend circumcision. They only say “Evaluation of current evidence indicates that the health benefits of newborn male circumcision outweigh the risks; furthermore, the benefits of newborn male circumcision justify access to this procedure for families who choose it.” But they never actually make that evaluation (calculating the Number Needed to Treat [NNT] vs the Number Needed to Harm [NNH]), they just throw a lot of studies at the page and jump to their conclusion. Their 2012 policy is hopelessly biased towards circumcision. For example, lacking any statistics on major complications and death, they just throw up their hands and ignore those risks.
    Here is an annotated copy of the policy, detailing its faults: http:tinyurl.com/aapanno .

    Reply

  9. Although I do nt have children as of yet I am sure if I have a boy I will be circumcising. My current boyfriend was not circumcised at birth, this caused him problems later in life. When he was 18 he was not able to get his head through his “turtle neck”. It burned when he peed and he was in a great deal of pain because of it. He saw his family doctor and was told that he would need surgery to remove the foreskin. At 18 this is not an easy thing to do, at any age really. It was two weeks of hell as he describes it. If his parents had of done the procedure when he was born he would not have had to go through that. You said something about putting the baby through a horrific painful experience. Does the child remember the experience later in life? No. Could the child perhaps need the procedure done later in life when they will remember it ? Yes.
    This is totally just my opinion but I would rather have it done and avoid any aggregation that my child may have later in life.

    Reply

    • Pauge,

      I would like to encourage you to keep researching about circumcision, to prepare you for any future decisions you might have to make. Don’t base your decision for your future sons on your boyfriend’s experience. One man’s experience should not dictate that all boys ever born should have their foreskins removed (extremely painfully) at birth. Just because someone doesn’t remember something, does that make it right? Speaking hypothetically, if someone drugged you and assaulted you while you were sleeping, is it okay because you can’t remember it?

      You should know that the chances that a boy will absolutely *need* a circumcision later in life are almost nil. Most of the time, it is because the parents (or other caregivers, such as doctors) “messed with” the foreskin, retracting it before it was ready and causing problems. Intact penis care is so easy, just wipe it like a finger, and leave it alone.

      There is a tonne of information at http://www.drmomma.org. For your future sons’ sake, please read through the articles there.

      Reply

    • The incidence of problems with the foreskin is very small. In New Zealand the circumcision rate is about 0.35%, and in Austria the non-Muslim rate is around 1%. This is the approximate rate at which problems needing medical attention occur. In your husband’s case, circumcision may not even have been needed, as devices for stretching the opening are available.

      Now consider that you are planning to alter someone’s genitals based on a 1% probability that a problem will occur. Where does that intervention stop? Pull out all his teeth because he will have problems with them? We have problems with every part of our bodies; when that happens we fix it. If it isn’t broke, don’t fix it.

      I am currently restoring my foreskin to regain some of the sensation so my wife and I can have normal sex again. I wish my parents had thought about this before submitting me to this senseless brutality. Circumcision has consequences too -bad ones. Your husband my seem OK now, but just wait. 20 years from now he may wish he had those nerve cells back.

      Reply

    • Your boyfriend was done a vast disservice.
      Any Dr that orders surgery before try less invasive (and proven highly effective) techniques should be questioned thoroughly (and ignored. His Dr was a quack).
      Do you know what would have happened to your boyfriend had he seen a Dr from Europe or Australia (where Drs don’t cut first and ask questions later)?
      He would have been prescribed a cream and some stretching exercises.
      Instead of surgery and a very painful recovery, he would have had to rub cream on his penis and play with it two or three times a day for a couple of weeks. Oh the humanity.

      This is why the cultural norm of circumcision needs to be questioned. Because a Dr should know that there are better ways of treating a penis than cutting it.

      But your reasoning is strange. Your boyfriend experienced two weeks of hell as an adult who could vocalise his pain, and be given good drugs for it, so you’ll deliberately subject any male child you have to that same pain and all they can have are the mildest drugs possible, on the off chance they may one day ‘need’ it. How does that make sense?
      They won’t remember it, so it doesn’t matter what is done to them?
      Not being able to remember isn’t a very good reason to do something to another human being.

      Ask more questions.
      Do more research.
      The presence of the male foreskin is not a pathology.

      Reply

  10. Thank you, Lindsey, for your thoughtful & well-researched article. The second-class citizenship of American boys is a disgrace. Parents would never let a doctor rip apart the genitals of their precious daughters. Boys are treated like inferior citizens, without the same right to bodily integrity that girls enjoy under the law. The male penis has been trivialized into a disgusting dirty object of scorn by the circumcision industry, which has no intention of ever stopping their cruel practice. They hide behind a smokescreen of preposterous health claims that men in the rest of the world disprove by merely living with their intact genitals, just as normal men & women have lived throughout human history. The realilty is that the pro-circ medical lobby has a vision of America as a place where generation after generation of men will live and die with wounded genitals. The malevolent genius of forced infant circumcision is that its victims become its chief proponents in a terrible impulse to deny their own loss. As a circumcised man, I stand up with the truth, “This is wrong. It stops with me.” Others who accept their circumcision without objection, or embrace it, live under the tyranny of the circumciser, who owns them. Every absurd hypothesis put forth by the circumciser to justify himself has also been used to justify female circumcision. It’s a sick world out there, and American doctors bear the bloodstained mark of their own shame.

    Reply

  11. I just wanted to say God never changes and has not done away with circumcision in the New Covenant. We refer to it as water baptism the dying to Christ in the water and circumcision of the heart. I just wish I would have known about this years ago. Thanks for the information. It looks like its this generation that is going to put a stop to all this nonsense, this and other things in this world.

    Reply

  12. [...] And I hope other will also follow. Sources: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khitan_(circumcision) The Five Myths Of Circumcision | Modern Alternative Pregnancy Myths about Circumcision You Likely Believe | Psychology Today Muslim Boys undergo Circumcision [...]

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Back to Top